How TGG Helped an Energy Services Company Investigate Unpredictable Gross Margins

An energy services company experienced significant fluctuations in its reported gross profit margins, ranging from about 8% in one quarter to 39% in the next. While occasional changes in profitability are expected in project-based businesses, a swing of this magnitude made it difficult to determine how consistently the company was performing.
During a financial review, TGG Accounting identified the volatility as an issue requiring closer investigation. Rather than assuming the fluctuations reflected normal business activity, our Consulting CFO recommended examining the company’s accounting practices, pricing consistency, and job mix to determine what was driving the changes.
Gross profit margins are an important measure of operational performance for energy services companies. They help leadership understand whether projects are priced appropriately, costs are being managed, and completed work is generating the expected returns.
However, when reported margins fluctuate dramatically between periods, the numbers become less useful for evaluating performance and making financial decisions.
In this case, the difference between an 8% and 39% gross margin raised questions about whether the company’s financial reports accurately reflected its underlying profitability.
TGG identified three potential explanations for the company’s inconsistent gross margins:
Determining which factors were responsible was essential to understanding whether the fluctuations reflected actual business performance or inconsistencies in financial reporting.
keeps everyone on the same page
allows for informed decision making
guards against pitfalls
give our clients the cutting edge with investors
To address the uncertainty, TGG recommended strengthening the relationship between three operational functions:
Estimating: Accurate estimating establishes realistic expectations for project costs and profitability before work begins.
Job Costing: Consistent job costing tracks actual expenses against those estimates, making it easier to identify where margins differ from projections.
Post-job Reviews: Sometimes called “stand-downs,” post-job reviews complete the process by examining finished projects to understand what went according to plan and where costs or pricing assumptions may need adjustment.
By connecting these functions, companies can use information from completed projects to improve future estimates, identify recurring cost discrepancies, and make more informed pricing decisions.
TGG’s financial review identified a significant profitability concern and established a practical approach for investigating its causes.
Stabilization doesn’t necessarily mean achieving the same gross margin every month. Different projects, pricing structures, and cost requirements naturally affect profitability. Instead, the goal is to reduce unexplained fluctuations and develop a consistent, defensible understanding of what drives margins. How quickly those improvements become apparent depends on the underlying causes and the company’s project cycles.
More consistent reporting would give leadership a stronger basis to evaluate project performance, compare results across periods, and make operational decisions.
The case demonstrates how TGG’s outsourced CFO services help energy services businesses look beyond reported financial figures to investigate the operational and accounting practices that influence profitability.
“Tighten the loop between estimating, job costing, and post-job ‘stand-downs.’ Your gross profit has swung between roughly 8% and 39% over recent periods. That kind of swing usually points to an accounting timing issue, inconsistent pricing, or product/job mix — and pinning down which one it is should meaningfully stabilize margins.”
— Charles Cecil, Consulting CFO, TGG Accounting